As a coding supervisor, what is the next action to take after noticing a coder is consistently performing better than others?

The action of performing a random audit of the individual coder is important in this scenario because it helps to verify the accuracy and quality of the work being done by the coder who is performing better than their peers. Conducting an audit allows the supervisor to ensure that the coder's higher productivity is not due to errors, coding inconsistencies, or shortcuts that may have been taken. It serves as a quality control measure and can provide insights into the coder's methods and practices, which might be beneficial for training other coders to improve their own performance.

Additionally, this approach also maintains a fair and consistent application of standards across the team. By individually auditing the coder, the supervisor can gather specific feedback that can inform coaching or recognition efforts, thereby supporting an overall culture of quality improvement within the team. This step paves the way for understanding the factors contributing to the coder's success, which can then be shared with others to enhance overall team performance.