As a HIM professional, what is the best course of action when uncomfortable with a recommendation from an external coding review?

Choosing to document concerns and take them to administration is the best course of action when uncomfortable with a recommendation from an external coding review. This approach ensures that the HIM professional maintains ethical standards while also advocating for the integrity of coding practices within the organization.

Documenting the concerns allows the HIM professional to compile specific details about the issues arising from the external review, providing a clear and objective basis for discussion. By bringing these concerns to administration, the HIM professional engages the relevant stakeholders who have the authority to address the matter directly. This communication can lead to a review of the coding guidelines and practices recommended by the external reviewers, ensuring that any decision made aligns with the organizational policies and ethical coding standards.

Additionally, this course of action helps to foster a culture of transparency and accountability regarding coding practices, as both staff and administration can collaboratively evaluate the recommendations and make informed decisions moving forward. It is essential for HIM professionals to uphold the principles of accuracy, integrity, and compliance in their work, and addressing discomfort in a structured manner is a proactive way to achieve this within their organization.