What type of evaluation offers feedback from a variety of sources rather than just supervisors?

A 360-degree evaluation is distinctive because it gathers feedback from multiple sources, including peers, subordinates, supervisors, and sometimes even clients or external stakeholders. This comprehensive approach provides a well-rounded perspective on an individual's performance, strengths, and areas for improvement. By collecting insights from various viewpoints, it helps to minimize bias that may arise when assessments are made solely by direct supervisors or managers.

Performance evaluations typically focus on the assessment conducted by immediate supervisors, often reflecting their perspective alone. Peer reviews generally involve evaluations conducted by a colleague or co-worker, which, while valuable, do not encompass the broader range of feedback that a 360-degree evaluation provides. Self-assessment relies entirely on an individual's own reflections concerning their performance and development, lacking the external viewpoints that enrich the 360-degree process.

Thus, the 360-degree evaluation stands out by fostering a multi-faceted understanding of performance, promoting a culture of open feedback and continuous improvement within organizations.